|
# |
City |
Pop |
Travel Cost |
IT Index |
|
1 |
Columbus, OH |
** |
*** |
21 |
|
2 |
Raleigh - Durham, NC |
** |
*** |
13 |
|
3 |
Nashville, TN |
** |
*** |
15 |
|
4 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
** |
** |
8 |
|
5 |
Atlanta, GA
|
*** |
** |
12 |
|
6 |
Minneapolis,
MN |
*** |
*** |
9 |
|
7 |
Louisville, KY |
** |
*** |
18 |
|
8 |
Austin,
TX |
** |
** |
20 |
|
9 |
Tampa,
FL |
** |
** |
21 |
|
10 |
San
Diego, CA |
** |
** |
32 |
Less Than 1M Population |
||||
|
1 |
Omaha,
NE |
*** |
*** |
10 |
|
2 |
Tucson,
AZ |
*** |
*** |
11 |
|
3 |
Huntsville,
AL |
** |
** |
10 |
|
4 |
Madison,WI |
** |
*** |
18 |
|
5 |
Boulder, CO |
** |
*** |
36 |
|
6 |
Overland Park, KS |
* |
*** |
45 |
|
7 |
Charlottesville, VA |
* |
$128 |
80 |
|
8 |
Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN |
* |
$116 |
40 |
|
9 |
Cambridge, MA |
* |
$125 |
140 |
|
10 |
Bellevue, WA |
* |
$115 |
70 |
|
# |
City |
Pop |
Travel Cost |
IT Index |
|
|
1 |
Minneapolis, MN |
*** |
*** |
9 |
|
|
2 |
Atlanta, GA |
*** |
** |
12 |
|
|
3 |
Columbus, OH |
** |
*** |
21 |
|
|
4 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
*** |
** |
8 |
|
|
5 |
Raleigh - Durham, NC |
** |
*** |
13 |
|
|
6 |
Nashville, TN |
** |
*** |
15 |
|
|
7 |
Louisville, KY |
** |
*** |
18 |
|
|
8 |
Austin,
TX |
** |
** |
20 |
|
|
9 |
San
Diego, CA |
** |
** |
32 |
|
|
10 |
Tampa,
FL |
** |
** |
21 |
|
Less Than 1M Population |
|
||||
|
1 |
Omaha,
NE |
** |
*** |
10 |
|
|
2 |
Tucson,
AZ |
** |
*** |
11 |
|
|
3 |
Madison,WI |
* |
*** |
18 |
|
|
4 |
Boulder, CO |
* |
*** |
36 |
|
|
5 |
Overland Park, KS |
* |
*** |
45 |
|
|
6 |
Huntsville,
AL |
* |
** |
10 |
|
|
7 |
Bellevue, WA |
* |
** |
70 |
|
|
8 |
Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN |
* |
** |
40 |
|
|
9 |
Cambridge, MA |
* |
** |
140 |
|
|
10 |
Charlottesville, VA |
* |
** |
80 |
|
|
# |
City |
Pop |
Travel Cost |
IT Index |
|
1 |
San Diego, CA |
** |
** |
32 |
|
2 |
Columbus, OH |
** |
*** |
21 |
|
3 |
Tampa, FL |
** |
** |
21 |
|
4 |
Austin, TX |
** |
** |
20 |
|
5 |
Louisville, KY |
** |
*** |
18 |
|
6 |
Nashville, TN
|
** |
*** |
15 |
|
7 |
Raleigh - Durham, NC |
** |
*** |
13 |
|
8 |
Atlanta, GA |
*** |
** |
12 |
|
9 |
Minneapolis, MN |
*** |
*** |
9.3 |
|
10 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
** |
** |
7.7 |
Less Than 1M Population |
||||
|
1 |
Cambridge, MA
|
** |
** |
140 |
|
2 |
Charlottesville, VA |
** |
** |
80 |
|
3 |
Bellevue, WA |
** |
** |
70 |
|
4 |
Overland Park, KS |
** |
*** |
45 |
|
5 |
Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN |
* |
** |
40 |
|
6 |
Boulder, CO |
** |
*** |
36 |
|
7 |
Madison,WI |
** |
*** |
18 |
|
8 |
Tucson, AZ |
** |
*** |
11 |
|
9 |
Omaha, NE |
** |
*** |
10 |
|
10 |
Huntsville, AL |
* |
** |
10 |
Summary:
Results varied wildly in each table when it was rearranged based upon those who will fly into the cities, those close enough to drive and the IT Index. The table below ranks the cities based upon their average ranking from all three tables. The over all winner, or the only city to rank in the top five on all three list’s is Columbus Ohio. Congratulations Columbus Ohio! Those with an average ranking of five (5) or better,, are represented in red font color. Some businesses will use one, two or all three tables based upon needs assessment. Others might rely upon the compilation table below. My recommendation to the firms I consult with will be a combination of all the tables based upon time and needs. Smaller firms, with less resources, might wish to save time and adhere strictly to the compilation table.
|
Avg |
City |
Pop |
Travel Cost |
IT Index |
|
2 |
Columbus, OH |
** |
*** |
21 |
|
4.7 |
Raleigh - Durham, NC |
** |
*** |
13 |
|
5 |
Nashville, TN
|
** |
*** |
15 |
|
5 |
Atlanta, GA |
*** |
** |
12 |
|
5.3 |
Minneapolis, MN |
*** |
*** |
9.3 |
|
6 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
** |
** |
7.7 |
|
6.3 |
Louisville, KY |
** |
*** |
18 |
|
6.7 |
San Diego, CA |
** |
** |
32 |
|
6.7 |
Austin, TX |
** |
** |
20 |
|
7.3 |
Tampa, FL |
** |
** |
21 |
|
3 |
Tucson, AZ |
** |
*** |
11 |
|
3.7 |
Omaha, NE |
** |
*** |
10 |
|
4.7 |
Madison, WI |
* |
*** |
18 |
|
5 |
Overland Park, KS |
* |
*** |
45 |
|
5 |
Boulder, CO |
* |
*** |
36 |
|
6.3 |
Huntsville, AL |
* |
** |
10 |
|
6.3 |
Cambridge, MA |
* |
** |
140 |
|
6.3 |
Charlottesville, VA |
* |
** |
80 |
|
6.7 |
Bellevue, WA |
* |
** |
70 |
|
7 |
Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN |
* |
** |
40 |
Airline tickets were
advanced purchase, round trip from Albany NY. If it is not listed under
southwest, the fair has at least one layover, possibly uses multiple carriers
and assumes a two night stay. Rates are non-AAA and non-senior. The number of
layovers will be denoted with the number that applies, eg. Suites were priced
for off peak, late November, but is the best rate we found for greater than a
‘3.5 star’ rated lodge. All suites are either outdoor heated, for down south,
or indoor pools, for northern cities. Also, a two night stay was assumed, but
the rate quoted above is the base cost per night.
IT index is based upon an
approximately 10,000 Zrinity customer’s in the database and is based upon the
number of people, or companies, building and using database driven Web site
tools in each of the related areas. The list by IT Index is order by cities
with over 1 million and then those under 1 million. It is based upon the number
of high tech people per million citizens.
Color Guide:
*** Red: Hot: Better
Than Average Score: Low Cost
**
Black: Average Score: Mediocre
Cost
* Blue: Cool: Less
Than Average Score: High Cost
Best bang for the buck
awards:
Southwest and Continental were by
far winners for access to the ‘Best Business Cities’ at low rates with the
least number of stops. La Quinta Inn & Suites, Amerisuites and Clubhouse Inn & Suites won for good rates, great suites and amenities
and, finally, for proximity to the cities.
References:
Southwest.com - Orbitz.com - TravelHero.com